Skip to main content

IFCC Working Group Recommendations for Assessing Commutability Part 2: Using the Difference in Bias Between a Reference Material and Clinical Samples.

Author
Abstract
:

A process is described to assess the commutability of a reference material (RM) intended for use as a calibrator, trueness control, or external quality assessment sample based on the difference in bias between an RM and clinical samples (CSs) measured using 2 different measurement procedures (MPs). This difference in bias is compared with a criterion based on a medically relevant difference between an RM and CS results to make a conclusion regarding commutability. When >2 MPs are included, the commutability is assessed pairwise for all combinations of 2 MPs. This approach allows the same criterion to be used for all combinations of MPs included in the assessment. The assessment is based on an error model that allows estimation of various random and systematic sources of error, including those from sample-specific effects of interfering substances. An advantage of this approach is that the difference in bias between an RM and the average bias of CSs at the concentration (i.e., amount of substance present or quantity value) of the RM is determined and its uncertainty estimated. An RM is considered fit for purpose for those MPs for which commutability is demonstrated.

Year of Publication
:
2018
Journal
:
Clinical chemistry
Date Published
:
2018
ISSN Number
:
0009-9147
DOI
:
10.1373/clinchem.2017.277541
Short Title
:
Clin Chem
Download citation